King Lear - Victim Of Love

In his blind egocentricity, Lear has broken the bonds of state, family and fri destinationship. By breaking these bonds, Lear transforms from a world-beaterful, item-by-item individual to a vulnerable, weak, desperate hu art objectity. Is this altogether his fault? Although around would be quick to theorise yes, I would befuddle to say no. Lear was a victim. He was a victim due to his immense compassion and trust. Lear is the perfect fount of the saying good guys manage in last. wherefore should we level the man for having a big watch? wherefore should we criticize him for pleasant and trusting his family? He deserves every(prenominal) of our sympathy and pity. there atomic number 18 numerous suits why he deserves our pity, but a a couple of(prenominal) very good cases stand bug out.         The catalyst that sparks the beginning of the end for Lear is his altercation with Cordelia during the ceremony. He asks his 3 daughters to profess their d elight to him. certain(a) this is sh any in all(prenominal)ow considering its through words, but every adept deserves to feel passionatenessd, and Lear, instal the simple man that he is, is content with words as proof of get it on. His 2 grayer daughters, Regan and G hotshotril do a hazardous job of appeasing him, delivering immaculate, embellished linguistic processes that meet and exceed what his simple evidence/write head would be satisfied with. Upon his most precious Cordelias turn, all she goat say is aught. That expert there is a harp because we all know she loves him to a greater extent than the other(a) dickens sisters. True she does not necessity to lie to her founder and exposit him with false warmth, however no.hing is a lie. She definitely loves him. She and so goes on to claim to love him check to my bond. She is fundamentally saying she precisely loves him because he is her father. That is a blatant lie, and still though she is trying to foster him by saying this, she truly crush! es his heart. Who can blame Lear for the focussing he reacted to this. How is one suppose to feel when ones most loved kidskin confesses that theyve just loved you according to family bond? It wasnt requisite for Cordelia to deliver an elaborate, fallacious speech like her sisters however she should confound come clean about(predicate) her love for him, because she did love him substantialheartedly. notwithstanding a simple, short justification of love would clear do him happy. I loved her most, and notion to set my rest on her pleasant nursery. he says. By trying not to lie to him, she lied to him even worse, and that is why Lear cant be blamed for what he did as a result.          Lear holds a world of trust in his family. He loves them so deeply that he believes anything they say. Innocently, he bestows upon his three daughters all of his power only to be mercilessly backstabbed by his proclaim roots. He was so blind by his genuine love for his daug hters that he couldnt perhaps imagine their ulterior motives. What kind of a cold, selfish, diabolical father would think such things of his daughters? disrespect how he may come across when he discourses, Lear is a softy deep down. At the whim of their rubbish words, Lear imparts his power to them. He trusts them with his life, for he go away have no power after giving it all up. Unfortunately, his daughters turned out to be demons. In the absence of their mother, he ran a whole empire to make life reform for his daughters. He risks everything on the strength of receiving love and commission from his daughters. He doesnt care about the power; he gave it all up in a second. He only essentialed to be loved, and Goneril and Regan took prefer of this compassionate trait of his to steal his power.         In a fearful attempt to get Lear to fit things for what they unfeignedly are, Kent gets himself banished. Although his intentions are kind, Kent moldiness r ealize that Lear has just had his heart shattered. He! is in pieces. When one is overcome by such elicit emotion, as is justify by what Lear had to endure, then its unsufferable to think in a rational manner. Further more, Kent doesnt reason with Lear in a careful way. When nearone has been so devastated, they must be dealt with delicately. Kent says, Be Kent bounderish when Lear is mad. What wouldst thou do, old man? By calling him mad, and old man, Kent further aggravates Lears emotion, adding angriness and frustration to his already frail state. This causes Lear to act even more irrational, and banishes Kent.

If one just had their heart broken by the one they l oved most in this world, the last thing they occupy is for psyche to step in and call them an idiot. As Lear shed it, Come not amidst the dragon and his wrath Kent should have approached Lear in a calmer, more soothing manner, perhaps asking him to step outside and speak privately. Instead Kent verbally embarrasses Lear in front of all the royalty, and adds aggravate to the injury. Kent brought his banishment upon himself.         Yes, Lear is the one who in the end breaks the bonds of state, friendship, and family. Was it his fault? No. Cordelia lied to him. She told him she had no love for him other than their family bond. Not only that, but she also says she would love some husband that she hasnt even met yet as such(prenominal) as she will love him. He loved her more than anything, and she took his heart and tore it into pieces without thought of the consequences. He loved and sure his two elder daughters, Goneril and Regan as well, handing them over two thirds of his empire, only to be deceived. Is it a ! horror to love and trust someone so much that you drop away sight of the truth? Its especially hard to see the truth when its something so horrid that its unthinkable. Kent fuelled the flames, and for it he was burned. As a loyal, long-time friend, he should have known how Lear would react, and should have taken wiser actions. Kent acted rashly and inconsiderately towards Lear, making a mockery of him in public. Lear had no natural selection but to extradite face and whatever ounce of hauteur he had remaining by banishing Kent although he surely didnt want to. Lear is a naïve man indeed, but all of his intentions were good. Who are we to blame him for loving his family and trusting them? Dont we all? How can we blame him for being naïve, its like blaming a rock for being dumb, thats just the way hes always been. In the end, Lear neglect victim because he was a kind, loving man, in a cruel, inconsiderate world. If you want to get a full essay, put up it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper